Medical Journal Forces Out Editor Who Questioned ‘Structural Racism,’ Professors Rejoice

Edward Livingston
by Benjamin Zeisloft

 

A leading medical journal terminated an editor who questioned the existence of structural racism. His fellow medical professors expressed approval of the firing.

The American Medical Association wrote in a statement that it was “deeply disturbed” and “angered” by a recent Journal of the American Medical Association podcast that “questioned the existence of structural racism.” Though the organization claimed that “JAMA has editorial independence from AMA,” the statement added that “this tweet and podcast are inconsistent with the policies and views of AMA.”

Accordingly, JAMA Editor-in-Chief Howard Bauchner asked for and received the resignation of podcast host and deputy editor Dr. Edward Livingston (pictured above).

The Daily Wire obtained a copy of the since-deleted podcast. During the episode, Livingston asked podcast guest Dr. Mitchell Katz, “Given that racism is illegal, how can it be so embedded in society that it’s considered structural?”

Katz explained several examples of structural racism, after which Livingston commented, “I feel like I’m being told I’m a racist in the modern era because of this whole thing about structural racism, but what you’re talking about, it isn’t so much racism as much as that there are populations, it’s more of a socioeconomic phenomenon, that have a hard time getting out of their place because of their environment.”

“And it isn’t their race; it isn’t their color; it’s their socioeconomic status,” he continued. “It’s where they are.” Katz responded to Livingston in agreement.

The podcast was promoted on JAMA’s Twitter page under the caption “No physician is racist, so how can there be structural racism in health care?”

When the American Medical Association announced the termination of Livingston — who has served as a professor at the University of California-Los Angeles and the University of Texas — on social media, other medical professors applauded the decision.

“Glad to see some concrete steps here after the #racist physician tweet/podcast,” wrote University of Minnesota medical professor Betsy Hirsch.

“Here is the AMA response to the ‘no physician is racist’ tweet and associated podcast,” added University of Southern California clinical pediatrics professor Michael Cosimini. “I remain very curious what the review process was before they released this piece and how it could have been let through.”

Campus Reform reached out to JAMA and Livingston for comment; this article will be updated accordingly.

– – –

Ben Zeisloft is a Pennsylvania Senior Campus Correspondent, reporting on liberal bias and abuse for Campus Reform. He is studying Finance and Marketing at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Benjamin also writes for The UPenn Statesman and the Wharton International Business Review.
Photo “Edward Livingston” by Jama Evidence.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Appeared at and reprinted from campusreform.org

Related posts

4 Thoughts to “Medical Journal Forces Out Editor Who Questioned ‘Structural Racism,’ Professors Rejoice”

  1. Tim Price

    When a organization resorts to eliminating their opponents by firing them, this media that said organization has no facts with which to argue.

    Sounds like Nazis and Facists to me!

  2. The left and MSM (sorry for the rhetoric) are frightened by the Michael Katzes of the world. Katz is 100% correct. Further, if the left wasn’t so hellbent on keep POC down, and keeping their voter base intact, they would take their thumb off of their lives. But they don’t want that to happen. Ever.

  3. Ms Independent

    Another cancel culture casualty. Racism is coming from from BLM and the Democratic Party. Silent majority is alive and woke…

  4. mikey whipwreck

    perhaps the mark of the beast won’t be a physical mark but a set of liberal ‘philosophies’

Comments